Understanding Sarah’s Email - Without Hacking her Account

The following guest post is written by ‘Akhbar the Great’ who posts over at http://theenlighteneddespot.com.

Be forewarned: the post you are about to read is about Troopergate. No, don’t run away! I know, I know, that story is so last year, and there are so many fresher scandals to enjoy. But as with love, so with ethics complaints against Sarah Palin: the first cut is the deepest. Sarah Palin has lied many, many times in her career, and done more than her fair of things that were illegal, unethical, or simply foolish. But nothing she has said in her defense on any of these issues has been as publicly noted and as straightforward as the claim that she had no knowledge of any of her aides or family members pressuring Walt Moneghan about Trooper Wooten.

If definitive evidence that this was a lie ever comes to light, it will stick to her and sink her as no other scandal has. When Palin was asked to hand over emails in a records request related to the Troopergate investigation, she withheld 1,100 of them, and there has been plenty of speculation that there might be a smoking gun amongst them. I’ll go a bit further: I have a good guess just which emails have the goods.

To begin with, though, a little background. I imagine most Mudflats readers are at least somewhat familiar with the case, but it’s been a while, so I imagine a little bit of review is in order:

  • The Call. The most damaging piece of evidence to come to light thus far in the Troopergate scandal was a recording of a phone call Palin aide Frank Bailey made to Lieutenant Rodney Dial. In the conversation, Bailey conveys the Palin family’s frustration that Walt Monegan hasn’t taken more forceful action against Trooper Wooten. Though he certainly makes it sound as if he is calling on the governor’s behalf, she has denied any foreknowledge of the call.Generally overlooked, however, is that the call does not start out as an inquiry about Wooten at all. The majority of the discussion between the two men concerns ongoing negotiations between the State and PSEA, the union which represents - amongst others - the State Troopers. Bailey, with a dismal attempt at subtlety, encourages Dial to forward any internal PSEA communications he receives regarding the negotiations. This would be a scandal in and of itself, if not for the fact that - unbeknownst to the Governor’s office - Dial was not a member of the union, and wouldn’t have access to anything that wasn’t completely public and available to Palin through other channels. It’s hard to say whether corruption or incompetence is the more salient feature of this interaction, though I’m inclined to go with the latter.
  • The emails. Corruption watchdog Andree McLeod - most recently known to Mudflatters for her anti-cleavage stance - made a documents request for a huge number of emails from the governor’s office. Of those requested, 1,100 were withheld, but McCleod did receive the date, subject heading, and recipient list for all of those emails. About 40 of these emails include Todd Palin as the sender or one of the recipients, making the legal case for withholding them especially problematic, for reasons I’ve gone into a bit before, but won’t bother with here.

OK, enough boring history. On to the smoking gun! Well, actually, just on to my theory of where it is, if only Governor Palin would let us see it:

On the afternoon of February 28th, Todd Palin made three phone calls to Palin aide Ivy Frye. At 8:09 PM that night, Frye sent an email to Todd and Sarah Palin, Frank Bailey, and Kris Perry, with the subject ‘PSEA’. At 9:28 AM the next morning, Sarah Palin sent out a reply to the same group. That same morning, Bailey placed the notorious call to Rodney Dial, asking for the PSEA mailings, and then applying pressure over Trooper Wooten. Later that day, Bailey sent the following to Frye:

Leaving pretty quick for the airport…call me though I need to give you a heads up. Spoke to Rodney and he doesn’t get that kind of stuff since he’s a Lieutenant, but he’d definitely pass it on.

Whether Bailey was too stupid to understand what Dial told him about not getting ‘that stuff’ or too embarassed to admit it is a question I will leave for the reader to ponder. But the evidence that these emails will prove Palin did in fact know about the Dial phone call - though circumstantial - strikes me as pretty powerful. Bailey does not need to specify what ’stuff’ he’s talking about - so Frye already knew he was going to contact Dial on the subject. Frye had sent Bailey an email on the subject the night before. And Sarah Palin received and responded to that email.

As is perhaps obvious at this point, this has been something of an obsession of mine over the past months, and I’ve continually been amazed that more attention wasn’t paid to the issue during the election. At this point, the MSM has better things to do, but Palin still has a career and - at least in her imagination - a political future, so it’s hardly irrelevant. If the Mudflats readership doesn’t think this is significant, then maybe I really am crazy. So, what say you, Mudflatters?

16 Responses to “Understanding Sarah’s Email - Without Hacking her Account”

  1. 1
    Irishgirl Says:

    I think you have made a very damning observation. No wonder Palin won’t release those e-mails!

  2. 2
    The Enlightened Despot » Blog Archive » Welcome, Mudflatters Says:

    [...] have a guest post up over on the Mudflats sister site. For regular readers, there’s nothing there you [...]

  3. 3
    WfAK Says:

    Hi - I think you are one of those people who would do well on those test questions for logic - “If Fred eats french fries on Tuesday and goes to a Shakerpearean play on Friday, who was Amanda’s date for the prom?”
    Well, you get the drift, and I think your argument makes sense.

    PS - Walt Monegan instead of Gene Monahan, just fyi.

  4. 4
    TiredMom Says:

    The Mudpup thinks you should keep stirring the pot, keep digging, just keep at it until someone can nail her to the wall!

  5. 5
    austintx Says:

    Yup - after your observation and explanation , it makes sense.

  6. 6
    Akhbar the Great Says:

    Whoops.

    Walt Monegan is relevant to this story.
    Gene Monahan is the head trainer for the New York Yankees.

    Never blog about politics while watching baseball.

  7. 7
    MonaLisa IS MY NAME! Says:

    Actually, yes. Significant!

  8. 8
    the problem child Says:

    Telling, if circumstantial. I guess they let one through that they shouldn’t have. I’m quite sure that the screener was handed a list of e-mails that they didn’t want to get out and told to come up with reasons not to release them.

  9. 9
    UK Lady Says:

    Well done, kudos, sounds convincing to me

  10. 10
    curiouser Says:

    Looks like you’ve zeroed in on significant info that could bust open her lies. Then there’s the trick of getting someone to hold her accountable. There wasn’t enough public support to insist the legislature compare the Branchflower and Personnel Board investigations and find out who was lying.

  11. 11
    GlobalVillage Says:

    Of course you’re not crazy. Unfortunately when dealing with people like this, who lie and deceive, and you can see through the whole mess but they keep getting away with it, you definitely begin to doubt yourself. However you, like many others, have the damning information; but the big question is, how do you make it stick? How do you make something happen when so much information has been revealed but despite this nothing happens? This is pure frustration! I feel your pain.

  12. 12
    ValleyIndependent Says:

    Your logic works for me. If all was on the up-and-up in Palin-land, they’d have been released long before now along with some statement to the effect of “See, I told you I had nothing to hide.” The fact that they haven’t been released means there’s something in there that’s not kosher. Since they have already identified the dates, times, senders and recipients, it can’t be that hard to download them to a disk is usable format.

  13. 13
    sauerkraut Says:

    Seems we are assuming Sarahkins didn’t read all the emails… let’s say she did read that series of emails… what does that make her (besides an out-n-out liar)?

    Informed.

    Oh and I agree about watching baseball and blogging concurrently… besides the fact that no one should ever (ever!) watch skankee baseball.

  14. 14
    The Enlightened Despot » Blog Archive » Honoring Our Rapid Reax Says:

    [...] have a guest internet clogging up Alaska’s [...]

  15. 15
    Paula Says:

    How to hack a hack… a book title just waitin’ to be used.

  16. 16
    Tina Nelson Says:

    I wonder if $arah used her Yahoo account to communicate her wishes to the minions?

    Several years ago, a friend received an email from her husband who was overseas working in Dubai. He explained in the email that he was seeing someone else and would be seeking a divorce. Her lawyer said it was time-and-date-stamped gold.

Leave a Reply

Readers who viewed this page, also viewed: